{"id":1348,"date":"2017-09-12T12:46:21","date_gmt":"2017-09-12T12:46:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/?p=1348"},"modified":"2024-05-23T14:09:18","modified_gmt":"2024-05-23T14:09:18","slug":"que-circunstancias-llevarian-a-un-nuevo-juicio-solo-sobre-la-indemnizacion-por-danos-y-perjuicios","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/blog\/que-circunstancias-llevarian-a-un-nuevo-juicio-solo-sobre-la-indemnizacion-por-danos-y-perjuicios\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00bfQu\u00e9 circunstancias llevar\u00edan a un nuevo juicio s\u00f3lo sobre la indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>En <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=15228252665540042456&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=6&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholarr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Bavlsik contra General Motors<\/strong><\/a>, Nos. 16-1491, 16-1632, (8th Cir. 2017), el Tribunal de Apelaciones del Octavo Circuito se ocup\u00f3 de esta cuesti\u00f3n.<\/p>\n<p>Hace unos cinco a\u00f1os, Michael Bavlsik (\"Bavlsik\") conduc\u00eda su furgoneta GMC Savana de 2003 cuando colision\u00f3 con una embarcaci\u00f3n remolcada por otro veh\u00edculo. Bavlsik llevaba puesto el cintur\u00f3n de seguridad, pero eso no le impidi\u00f3 golpearse la cabeza con el techo cuando la furgoneta volc\u00f3. Como resultado, Bavlsik sufri\u00f3 una lesi\u00f3n en la m\u00e9dula espinal cervical y ahora es tetrapl\u00e9jico. Bavlsik y su esposa, Kathleen Skelly, demandaron a General Motors (\"GM\"), la empresa que dise\u00f1\u00f3 y fabric\u00f3 la furgoneta, por: responsabilidad objetiva, alegando que el sistema de cinturones de seguridad carec\u00eda de tres caracter\u00edsticas de seguridad espec\u00edficas; dise\u00f1o negligente, basado en que GM no implement\u00f3 estas caracter\u00edsticas de seguridad ni realiz\u00f3 las pruebas adecuadas en la furgoneta; y omisi\u00f3n de advertencia. Tras once d\u00edas de juicio, el jurado declar\u00f3 que GM hab\u00eda actuado negligentemente por no haber probado la furgoneta y que tal negligencia hab\u00eda causado las lesiones de Bavlsik. El jurado rechaz\u00f3 todas las dem\u00e1s reclamaciones y teor\u00edas. Bavlsik iba a recuperar $1 millones (todos por da\u00f1os pasados), hasta que el tribunal de primera instancia concedi\u00f3 la moci\u00f3n renovada de GM de sentencia como cuesti\u00f3n de derecho (\"JML\") y anul\u00f3 el veredicto. Bas\u00e1ndose en las peticiones de Bavlsik y su esposa, el tribunal tambi\u00e9n concedi\u00f3 condicionalmente un nuevo juicio \u00fanicamente por da\u00f1os y perjuicios. Ambas decisiones nos ocupan ahora. Bavlsik y Skelly sostienen que presentaron pruebas suficientes para apoyar el veredicto, por lo que GM no ten\u00eda derecho a la JML. GM no est\u00e1 de acuerdo, y argumenta que si es necesario un nuevo juicio, entonces las partes tambi\u00e9n deben volver a tratar la cuesti\u00f3n de la responsabilidad.<\/p>\n<p>El Tribunal, a la hora de decidir si anula el veredicto de un jurado, debe verlo todo de la manera m\u00e1s favorable a la parte vencedora. El Tribunal debe asumir que todos los conflictos en las pruebas se resolvieron a favor de la parte vencedora, asumir como probados todos los hechos, dar a la parte vencedora el beneficio de todas las inferencias favorables. Hecho esto, el Tribunal debe decidir si una persona razonable podr\u00eda diferir en cuanto a las conclusiones extra\u00eddas de las pruebas.<\/p>\n<p>El jurado del tribunal inferior declar\u00f3 responsable a GM por no haber sometido a pruebas adecuadas la furgoneta en cuesti\u00f3n. Formaba parte de una demanda m\u00e1s amplia por negligencia en el dise\u00f1o, por lo que los demandantes tuvieron que probar los elementos habituales de la negligencia: obligaci\u00f3n, incumplimiento, causalidad y da\u00f1os. Dado que el Tribunal de Apelaci\u00f3n examin\u00f3 todas las pruebas a favor de la parte vencedora, y GM no present\u00f3 nuevas pruebas para refutarlas, el Tribunal confirm\u00f3 la sentencia del jurado del tribunal inferior. La cuesti\u00f3n era si la falta de pruebas fue la causa de las lesiones de Bavlsik. El jurado del tribunal inferior crey\u00f3 en el testimonio experto presentado por la parte de Bavlsik en relaci\u00f3n con las pruebas. As\u00ed pues, considerando las pruebas del modo m\u00e1s favorable a Bavlsik, el Tribunal de Apelaci\u00f3n hall\u00f3 pruebas legalmente suficientes para apoyar la conclusi\u00f3n del jurado sobre la causalidad.<\/p>\n<p>A continuaci\u00f3n, el Tribunal de Apelaci\u00f3n estudi\u00f3 si deb\u00eda celebrarse un nuevo juicio por da\u00f1os y perjuicios. (El tribunal inferior s\u00f3lo concedi\u00f3 $1 millones por da\u00f1os pasados, nada por p\u00e9rdidas futuras ni ninguna indemnizaci\u00f3n a la esposa de Bavlsik por p\u00e9rdida de consorcio). El tribunal inferior podr\u00eda haber llegado a varias opciones diferentes al decidir si estaba justificado un nuevo juicio. El Tribunal de Apelaci\u00f3n estaba convencido de que las cuestiones de da\u00f1os y responsabilidad son independientes, luego procede un nuevo juicio por los da\u00f1os futuros de Bavlsik.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Bavlsik v. General Motors, Nos. 16-1491, 16-1632, (8th Cir. 2017), the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit took on this question. About five years ago Michael Bavlsik (\u201cBavlsik\u201d) was driving his 2003 GMC Savana van when he collided with a boat being towed by another vehicle. Bavlsik was wearing his seatbelt, but that &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/blog\/que-circunstancias-llevarian-a-un-nuevo-juicio-solo-sobre-la-indemnizacion-por-danos-y-perjuicios\/\" class=\"more-link\">Seguir leyendo<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;What Circumstances Would Lead to a New Trial on the Damage Award Only?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,13],"tags":[150,326,186],"class_list":["post-1348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-car-accidents","category-personal-injury","tag-personal-injury","tag-personal-injury-attorney","tag-tort","entry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>What Circumstances Would Lead to a New Trial on the Damage Award Only? - Northland Injury Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"By: Thomas Metier In Bavlsik v. General Motors, Nos. 16-1491, 16-1632, (8th Cir. 2017), the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit took on this question. About five years ago Michael Bavlsik (\u201cBavlsik\u201d) was driving his 2003 GMC Savana van when he collided with a boat being towed by another vehicle. Bavlsik was wearing his\u2026\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/blog\/que-circunstancias-llevarian-a-un-nuevo-juicio-solo-sobre-la-indemnizacion-por-danos-y-perjuicios\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_MX\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What Circumstances Would Lead to a New Trial on the Damage Award Only? - Northland Injury Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By: Thomas Metier In Bavlsik v. General Motors, Nos. 16-1491, 16-1632, (8th Cir. 2017), the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit took on this question. About five years ago Michael Bavlsik (\u201cBavlsik\u201d) was driving his 2003 GMC Savana van when he collided with a boat being towed by another vehicle. Bavlsik was wearing his\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/blog\/que-circunstancias-llevarian-a-un-nuevo-juicio-solo-sobre-la-indemnizacion-por-danos-y-perjuicios\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Northland Injury Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/accidentinjurylawyers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-12T12:46:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-23T14:09:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Eric Bartlett\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Eric Bartlett\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutos\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u00bfQu\u00e9 circunstancias podr\u00edan dar lugar a un nuevo juicio s\u00f3lo sobre la indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios? - Ley de Lesiones Northland","description":"Por: Thomas Metier En Bavlsik v. General Motors, Nos. 16-1491, 16-1632, (8th Cir. 2017), el Tribunal de Apelaciones del Octavo Circuito se hizo cargo de esta cuesti\u00f3n. Hace unos cinco a\u00f1os, Michael Bavlsik (\"Bavlsik\") conduc\u00eda su furgoneta GMC Savana de 2003 cuando colision\u00f3 con un barco que estaba siendo remolcado por otro veh\u00edculo. Bavlsik llevaba su...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/blog\/que-circunstancias-llevarian-a-un-nuevo-juicio-solo-sobre-la-indemnizacion-por-danos-y-perjuicios\/","og_locale":"es_MX","og_type":"article","og_title":"What Circumstances Would Lead to a New Trial on the Damage Award Only? - Northland Injury Law","og_description":"By: Thomas Metier In Bavlsik v. General Motors, Nos. 16-1491, 16-1632, (8th Cir. 2017), the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit took on this question. About five years ago Michael Bavlsik (\u201cBavlsik\u201d) was driving his 2003 GMC Savana van when he collided with a boat being towed by another vehicle. Bavlsik was wearing his\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/blog\/que-circunstancias-llevarian-a-un-nuevo-juicio-solo-sobre-la-indemnizacion-por-danos-y-perjuicios\/","og_site_name":"Northland Injury Law","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/accidentinjurylawyers\/","article_published_time":"2017-09-12T12:46:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-23T14:09:18+00:00","author":"Eric Bartlett","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Eric Bartlett","Tiempo de lectura":"3 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/blog\/what-circumstances-would-lead-to-a-new-trial-on-the-damage-award-only\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/blog\/what-circumstances-would-lead-to-a-new-trial-on-the-damage-award-only\/"},"author":{"name":"Eric Bartlett","@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/1e35848aa80e77f1c0b4159d4073bc20"},"headline":"What Circumstances Would Lead to a New Trial on the Damage Award Only?","datePublished":"2017-09-12T12:46:21+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-23T14:09:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/blog\/what-circumstances-would-lead-to-a-new-trial-on-the-damage-award-only\/"},"wordCount":570,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/#organization"},"keywords":["personal injury","personal injury attorney","tort"],"articleSection":["Car Accidents","Personal Injury"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/blog\/what-circumstances-would-lead-to-a-new-trial-on-the-damage-award-only\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/blog\/what-circumstances-would-lead-to-a-new-trial-on-the-damage-award-only\/","url":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/blog\/what-circumstances-would-lead-to-a-new-trial-on-the-damage-award-only\/","name":"\u00bfQu\u00e9 circunstancias podr\u00edan dar lugar a un nuevo juicio s\u00f3lo sobre la indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios? - Ley de Lesiones Northland","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-09-12T12:46:21+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-23T14:09:18+00:00","description":"Por: Thomas Metier En Bavlsik v. General Motors, Nos. 16-1491, 16-1632, (8th Cir. 2017), el Tribunal de Apelaciones del Octavo Circuito se hizo cargo de esta cuesti\u00f3n. Hace unos cinco a\u00f1os, Michael Bavlsik (\"Bavlsik\") conduc\u00eda su furgoneta GMC Savana de 2003 cuando colision\u00f3 con un barco que estaba siendo remolcado por otro veh\u00edculo. Bavlsik llevaba su...","inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/blog\/what-circumstances-would-lead-to-a-new-trial-on-the-damage-award-only\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/","name":"Ley de lesiones de Northland","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/#organization","name":"Ley de lesiones de Northland","url":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/logo.jpg","width":415,"height":103,"caption":"Northland Injury Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/accidentinjurylawyers\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/northland-injury-law","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/northlandinjurylaw\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@northlandinjurylaw4755","https:\/\/www.yelp.com\/biz\/northland-injury-law-kansas-city","https:\/\/www.lawinfo.com\/lawfirm\/missouri\/kansas-city\/northland-injury-law\/ca10cabc-467c-446b-bfc0-f673053baf63.html","https:\/\/profiles.superlawyers.com\/missouri\/kansas-city\/lawfirm\/northland-injury-law\/ca10cabc-467c-446b-bfc0-f673053baf63.html","https:\/\/lawyers.findlaw.com\/profile\/view\/2362635_1","https:\/\/reviews.birdeye.com\/northland-injury-law-164779247415291","https:\/\/localspark.com\/listings\/legal-services\/kansas-city-mo\/northland-injury-law-5600-ne-antioch-rd-kansas-city-mo-64119\/","https:\/\/www.zoominfo.com\/p\/Stephen-Mowry\/126980529","https:\/\/www.datanyze.com\/companies\/northland-injury-law\/358568082"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/1e35848aa80e77f1c0b4159d4073bc20","name":"Eric Bartlett","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bf253cf71e20f6e1cffd8b8f42de35214279011bf47dbcb56d2ffc79a4f5d414?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bf253cf71e20f6e1cffd8b8f42de35214279011bf47dbcb56d2ffc79a4f5d414?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bf253cf71e20f6e1cffd8b8f42de35214279011bf47dbcb56d2ffc79a4f5d414?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Eric Bartlett"},"url":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/author\/eric-bartlett-2\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1348"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1348\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2731,"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1348\/revisions\/2731"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/northlandinjurylaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}